I thought I’d go into a bit more depth about the wolf design as it seems I didn’t communicate very well and the question is an interesting and illustrative one.
The reason I’ve been rattling on about realism and caricature lately is connected to the wolf design. The problem was how to depict a goblin-wolf without departing from the realistic style of the elf figure line. There are several objections to making the goblin-wolf look exactly like a real one, some are practical, a real wolf for example, even a large one is realistically, too small to carry a creature bigger than a four year old child.
However the more difficult matter which raises the question of the border of caricature and realism is in depicting and differentiating the wolf as a wolf (and of what kind, there are many varieties and wide variation within them) and not a dog. In real life many people could not tell a wolf from a dog except by it’s behavior, those who could would rely on subtle visual clues which their mind would automatically accentuate without them realizing it, as in the earlier point in this blog about recognition of faces in different cultures. The question is how and how much can wolfish characteristics be ‘brought out’ before the figure becomes a caricature. The solution I proposed was not to depart plausibility (since this is a fantasy creature and not even meant to be a normal wolf) and to accent wolfish characteristics only for clarification and differentiation, not simply exaggerating for emotional impact. It’s a fine point but I think it can be found.
The fur is the most problematic point, ‘real’ fur cannot practically be sculpted or cast on this scale, there are many ways of suggesting fur, unfortunately some have the effect of making the animal look cute and cuddly, others, perhaps the most ‘realistic’ ones do little to differentiate the wolf from a dog. One of my chief concerns was not to make something which looked like a shaggy German Shepherd (or Alsatian to our cousins in the U.K.) so I chose a bit more stylization than I would generally use. The result is a "fairy-tale wolf" but not an impossible beast and no one could mistake it for a dog or a hyena or, on seeing it, call it anything but a wolf though it is not exactly like one in many points of detail. The idea, put simply, was to make a wolf that looks a bit more like a wolf than a wolf does but not to the point of cartoon.
Trackbacks
Comments
-
Rob W.
says:
#1 2006-09-01 18:56 (Reply)Tom,
I liked your further explanation of the wolf and expressing characterization vs emotional impact, it really clarified some of what you were getting at. I enjoy learning what you think about as you sculpt these miniatures such as.....the second high elf archer - WOW, I thought the first one was about as good as it could get....
Rob -
Mathieu
says:
#2 2006-09-03 03:10 (Reply)I find that this wolf is very successful. And that we really have an impression of danger and evil.
Concerning the high elf,I like very much the helmet with the dragonfly.
I have however a small doubt for the bow :
the way in which this archer has to bend the rope whereas the bow is not in the axis and while a part of this bow is under its cloak.
But maybe I make a mistake. I made a little of archery when I was young (but it was long ago) -
Tom
says:
#3 2006-09-03 05:34 (Reply)You can sight a line from his fingers to where the lower tip of the bow would be, though it doesn't look like it in the one photo. I don't know why, something to do with the angle of the camera perhaps.
Of course I had to fill it around the lower end of the bow for casting. -
SueW
says:
#4 2006-09-12 07:45 (Reply)Tom, I understand the difficulty of the sculptor in depicting fur with realism, and as a mini painter, my question was if you ever consider what the painter will do with the miniature as presented? I've talked with other sculptors who are required by their company (erm) to think about the basics of painting and how they apply to the miniature they create. Those are obviously for gaming miniatures. I know it's a bit of a tangent, but is there a half-way point you ever think about where the two meet: sculpt and paint?
-
Tom
says:
#5 2006-09-13 10:02 (Reply)Yes, I expect them to be painted but I think my ideas about painting are a bit old fashioned and very simple. I don’t sculpt with the elaborate methods the most accomplished painters use in mind. I’ve got to admit I’m a bit confused when people say my figures will be such a challenge to paint because it seems to me they are very easy, just keep in the lines, do a little wash and dry brushing and you are done.



